Cookie notice

We only use functional and analytical cookies to ensure that this website functions optimally. These cookies do not use any personal data.

Published on: Nov 6, 2023

Knowledge Security in Sino-European Academic Collaborations

In the realm of global academia, European universities have long fostered collaborations with their Chinese counterparts. However, the heightened competition with China has brought knowledge security to the forefront of international discourse.


Short read

  • The increasing competition with China has raised concerns about knowledge security in Sino-European academic collaborations.
  • China’s policies, such as the “Made in China” initiative and Military-Civil Fusion (MCF), have intensified debates on knowledge transfer through academic collaborations.
  • China’s “Seven Sons of National Defense” universities are closely connected to the defense industry and contribute significantly to military research and development.
  • From the data, the United Kingdom emerged as a significant player in Sino-European academic collaborations. France, the Netherlands, Italy, and Germany follow.
  • The top research fields include engineering, mathematics, computer, and data science, as well as economics and management.
  • Periodic assessments of academic collaborations are essential to safeguard knowledge security and prevent unwanted knowledge transfer in critical technologies.

Over the years, European universities have strengthened collaboration with their Chinese counterparts and other research institutes. While the COVID-19 pandemic brought most of these collaborations to a standstill, the loosening of COVID-related travel restrictions in February 2023 allowed Chinese universities to fully resume academic exchanges, offering their students and researchers the opportunity to study abroad.

Amidst these developments, an increasingly competitive landscape with China has given rise to concerns about knowledge security and the need for tighter controls on academic collaborations. Governments are increasingly advocating for stricter controls on economic assets, not just for the sake of national security but also to safeguard economic and technological advantages.

China’s policies, such as its drive for technological innovation across various sectors under the “Made in China” initiative and the concept of Military-Civil Fusion (MCF) have amplified the debate around knowledge transfer through academic exchanges. Consequently, the possibility of knowledge transfer in academic research has become a critical subject of discussion, albeit one that has yet to be fully incorporated into export control debates.

The Current Landscape

The landscape of Sino-European academic collaborations is vast and multifaceted. To gain insights into the status quo, Datenna analysed 416 relevant collaborations across all fields of study, involving the top 20 Chinese universities and their European counterparts. While this is only a fraction of Chinese universities, these institutes have the highest quality of education and are best equipped to research relevant technologies.

The collaborations considered include substantial exchanges of knowledge, skills, educators, and students, emphasizing the potential for significant knowledge transfer. Short-term exchanges or research activities that limit the scope of knowledge transfer were excluded from the analysis.

The Data

From the data, the United Kingdom emerged as a significant player, with Sino-British academic collaborations constituting a substantial portion of these interactions. French institutions accounted for 20% of relevant research collaborations, followed by Dutch institutions at 11%. In contrast, collaborations with other countries were less prominent, each accounting for less than 10% of the total.

Among the diverse institutions involved, the top three European universities that actively collaborate with the selected 20 Chinese universities are the University of Edinburgh, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, and the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE).

Likewise, on the Chinese side, Zhejiang University, Fudan University, and Shanghai Jiao Tong University have been at the forefront of such collaborative efforts. Northwestern Polytechnical University, one of the renowned “Seven Sons” universities in China, ranks fifth and has established 8% of all relevant collaborations. These “Seven Sons” universities are closely linked to China’s defense industry, a connection underscored by a study from the Center for Security and Emerging Technology, revealing that three-quarters of Chinese defense State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) employees have graduated from these institutions.

China's Seven Sons

The Seven Sons of National Defense, or Seven Sons, is a group of Chinese national research universities known for their contributions to ((military research)) and close collaboration with the People’s Liberation Army. These universities are instrumental in advancing China’s military research and development and have a significant role in Chinese defense-related initiatives.

Every year, the majority of these universities are tapped for recruitment by Chinese defense conglomerates, and more than half of their budgets are allocated to defense-related research. This strong focus on defense is further highlighted by the supervisory role of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT), which oversees China’s defense industry through its subsidiary, the State Administration for Science, Technology, and Industry for National Defense.

The Seven Sons of National Defense include:

1. Beijing Institute of Technology
2. Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
3. Harbin Engineering University
4. Harbin Institute of Technology
5. Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
6. Nanjing University of Science and Technology
7. Northwestern Polytechnic University

Sino-European academic collaboration with Seven Sons

Datenna’s study included Sino-European academic collaborations with the likelihood of knowledge transfer of 13 top Chinese universities and added the Seven Sons. The graph on the left shows Sino-European academic collaborations of twenty top Chinese universities*, including Seven Sons; the chart on the right shows Sino-European academic collaborations with Seven Sons. For most countries, collaboration with Seven Sons universities is in line with their share when considering a more comprehensive selection of universities. The UK, France, the Netherlands, and Italy are the countries with the most university collaborations with Seven Sons universities, but this also applies to the broader university sample. The location of universities that established the most collaborations with Seven Sons universities echoes these findings: the Queen Mary University of London established five academic collaborations with risky academic entities; the Polytechnic University of Turin and the University of Twente both established four.

When comparing the graphs, Germany and Russia stand out. Germany, which ranks third in academic collaborations with a broader range of Chinese universities (9%), drops to sixth place (5%) when considering only Seven Sons universities. Conversely, Russia exhibits the opposite trend, with a higher share of collaborations with Seven Sons universities than with regular universities. Collaborations with Seven Sons universities are primarily established in the fields of engineering (32%), mathematical, computer, and data science (19%), and economics and management (15%).

*Note: The ranking is based on the SCImago Institutions Rankings (SIR) and includes all Seven Sons of National Defense.

In an environment of heightened competition with China and its emphasis on technological advantages, academic collaborations are increasingly relevant in the context of export control. While the status of academic research in the field is still evolving, some legislative examples, such as the U.S. government’s decision to halt visas for graduate students and researchers affiliated with defense-related academic institutions like the Seven Sons of National Defense, highlight its importance. Access to data on Chinese academic partners, their affiliations, and preferred areas of research is fundamental, especially for collaborations that involve areas of strategic value to the Chinese government and the defense industry.

Thus, academic collaborations must be critically assessed on a periodic basis to safeguard knowledge security. Collaborations with China’s Seven Sons of National Defense should be approached with extra care, and assessments should be made on a case-by-case basis to prevent the unwanted transfer of knowledge on critical technologies.

As governments advocate for tighter controls on economic assets to safeguard national security and technological advantages, understanding knowledge transfer’s implications in academic collaborations remains paramount, particularly in fields of strategic value.